The Secret.
Let me tell you a secret: I find Scripture hard to understand. Yes, yes, there are some portions which are plain as day – but to me, the Scriptures are difficult to understand and to apply.
I’ve read the Scriptures a fair bit. As a child and teenager I was required by my parents to read at least a chapter a day if I wanted to receive my $3 in allowance each week. I became extremely passionate as a teenage Christian and searched the Scriptures deeply – far beyond the requirements for my allowance and when I graduated from high school I pursued a Bachelors in Biblical Studies from Philadelphia Biblical University and since then I’ve taught the Scriptures on almost a weekly basis – sometimes multiple times each week – for the past eight years.
Yet I still struggle to understand the Scriptures – and I know others do as well. I’ve seen this especially amongst my teenagers – as I’ve challenged them to make reading the Scriptures a daily habit. There is a feeling of inability to understand and transfer the principles from the original writings to (post-)modern life.
William Barclay.
This struggle was greatly relieved for me when I stumbled upon William Barclay’s Daily Study Bible commentaries. Barclay wrote in a clear and concise manner – diving into the historical, philosophical, grammatical, and contextual nature of the text – while maintaining lay readability and applicability. I have and continue to rely upon Barclay’s commentaries for insight and I find them to be a useful resource for me to the current day in spite of the wide variety of other resources I utilize including the amazing Logos Bible Software Scholars (Silver) Edition.
I realized that there was a need for similar contemporary commentaries written from a more evangelical / orthodox position than Barclay’s commentaries and yet my searches have returned empty time and again.
The Vision.
It has grown in my heart over a number of years to write a series of commentaries on the bible of a similar nature to Barclay’s commentaries – but spanning both the Old and New Testaments.
It is important to note that I have no intention of revolutionizing theology in doing so – rather I humbly submit a similar interest as Barclay – who saw himself not as an innovator but as a compiler and synthesizer of what wiser men had said. My desire is to write commentaries which express the beliefs of the orthodox faith while also presenting diverse alternative opinions for consideration.
Going Deeper:
Barclay’s commentaries are amazing, but they are not the end-all. At times they leave one disappointed. Barclay dives so deep at some points, yet elsewhere he simply skims over the meat offering a few devotional thoughts. This was perhaps necessary due to the nature of the work but exposes a weakness in devotional commentaries – they oftentimes fail to evaluate deeply enough areas of theological concern. This is where modern technology comes into the picture.
I’d like to write commentaries which serve as the first layer in a multilayer approach to Scriptural study. After one reads the devotional commentary one will be able to “drill-down” to more extensive commentaries. Specifically, I’d like to compile the opinions of individuals and organizations throughout Christian history – summarizing who supported what position and providing quotes of major positions, thoughts, etc.
Eventually, I’d love to see this drill all the way down to original languages tools…But it all begins with a simple devotional commentary that every person in a congregation could use to help them understand the Scriptures.
The End:
After several years with little progress on this venture I realized that some of the commentaries in Logos where available free online due to the generosity of Dr. Bob Utley. I found his commentaries to be right along the lines of my vision for the Layered Bible series and asked if he would give me permission to utilize them as a basis for Layered Bible – he graciously said yes! So, here I am, morphing Dr. Utley’s volumes into the exact vision I had for Layered Bible at the first level (of lay commentary).
The volumes will (to start) be largely copies of Dr. Utley’s commentaries, but I have attempted to make modifications as necessary. In general, I do not believe these changes alter the meaning of Dr. Utley – they are mainly grammatical, explanatory, etc. – and I have attempted to include footnotes wherever I have made any significant alteration to the actual text. However, any inferiority found in these updated texts should be solely accredited to myself and full thanks and recognition for the depth and width of scholarship must be given to Dr. Utley.